Why it matters:
The article highlights the lackluster performance of the Republican Party without Donald Trump in the 2024 primary debates. It discusses the absence of Trump, the expected attacks on certain candidates, and the audience’s response to various participants.
What they are saying:
The article points out that Trump’s absence reminded viewers of why he easily won against Republicans in the past. It also suggests that Trump’s decision to skip the debate makes sense as he is polling well ahead of his rivals. The article criticizes the Republican Party without Trump, calling it boring, disconnected, and soul-crushing to watch. It highlights the disappointing performance of Ron Desantis and the unexpected attacks on Vivek Ramaswamy. It also discusses the anticipation for booing and attacks on Mike Pence, as well as Chris Christie’s criticism of Trump.
The big picture:
The article suggests that the Republican Party lacks excitement and impact without Donald Trump. It implies that Trump’s dominance and controversy overshadow the other candidates and their performances. The anticipation for attacks and booing reflects the divided nature of the Republican Party and the lingering effects of Trump’s influence.
What to watch:
It will be interesting to see if the Republican Party can regain its energy and capture public interest without Trump’s presence. Future debates and campaign events will determine if any candidate can emerge as a strong challenger to Trump’s popularity within the party.
My take:
The article underscores the significant impact of Donald Trump’s absence on the Republican primary debates. It highlights the struggles of other candidates to make an impact and the lack of enthusiasm for their performances. Without Trump, the Republican Party seems to lack the same level of excitement and engagement. This raises questions about the party’s future and its ability to connect with voters without its controversial figurehead.
